Skip to main content

The Hunger Games Review



Contrary to my initial opinion of it, The Hunger Games is not just another Twilight rip-off. This is, of course, a wonderful thing.

It is apparent right from the start of the movie that its tone will be far darker than that of most movies based on young adult novels. This is ultimately its greatest strength. I’m not going to waste any time talking about the plot of the movie, or why it makes for a compelling story. If you don’t know it, Wikipedia can be helpful with things like that. First things first, though. The acting in this film is simply spectacular, and it would be an understatement to say that Jennifer Lawrence is apparently not an overrated actress. She perfectly captures the role of Katniss. The supporting actors certainly do a fine job in their roles, but it’s Lawrence who really steals the show here. As I said before, the film’s greatest strength is its dark atmosphere, and it isn’t afraid to kill off even major characters. This works wonders for it. In many places, it hits hard. The pacing is shockingly good for a movie that basically consists of a girl walking through miles of woods and trying to not get killed. It never lingers on one subject too long, and keeps things moving fast, but never feels rushed.


If you know anything about the plot of The Hunger Games and its sequels, you’ll know that they certainly have a good deal of emotion in them, and this carries over into the film spectacularly. The film’s realism helps it. It’s often moving, and it always keeps the viewer involved. It would be wrong of me to go without mentioning James Newton Howard’s score. While it may not be wonderful on its own, inside the film, it is excellent. One of the film’s only weak points is that the end feels very abrupt, and if I had not known going into it that there would be sequels, I might have assumed it was a stand-alone film. Another problem is that it doesn’t always highlight the larger events occurring outside of the arena. We don’t always feel the tyranny of the Capital as much as we should, and this leads to the stakes not being quite high enough in places. However, these problems were present in the book, so ultimately I can’t criticize the film too much for them. Ultimately, The Hunger Games is an excellent film and is well worth watching. I’m giving it 4/5 stars.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...

Casino Royale Review

Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.) The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immedia...