The Hunger Games Review

Contrary to my initial opinion of it, The Hunger Games is not just another Twilight rip-off. This is, of course, a wonderful thing.

It is apparent right from the start of the movie that its tone will be far darker than that of most movies based on young adult novels. This is ultimately its greatest strength. I’m not going to waste any time talking about the plot of the movie, or why it makes for a compelling story. If you don’t know it, Wikipedia can be helpful with things like that. First things first, though. The acting in this film is simply spectacular, and it would be an understatement to say that Jennifer Lawrence is apparently not an overrated actress. She perfectly captures the role of Katniss. The supporting actors certainly do a fine job in their roles, but it’s Lawrence who really steals the show here. As I said before, the film’s greatest strength is its dark atmosphere, and it isn’t afraid to kill off even major characters. This works wonders for it. In many places, it hits hard. The pacing is shockingly good for a movie that basically consists of a girl walking through miles of woods and trying to not get killed. It never lingers on one subject too long, and keeps things moving fast, but never feels rushed.

If you know anything about the plot of The Hunger Games and its sequels, you’ll know that they certainly have a good deal of emotion in them, and this carries over into the film spectacularly. The film’s realism helps it. It’s often moving, and it always keeps the viewer involved. It would be wrong of me to go without mentioning James Newton Howard’s score. While it may not be wonderful on its own, inside the film, it is excellent. One of the film’s only weak points is that the end feels very abrupt, and if I had not known going into it that there would be sequels, I might have assumed it was a stand-alone film. Another problem is that it doesn’t always highlight the larger events occurring outside of the arena. We don’t always feel the tyranny of the Capital as much as we should, and this leads to the stakes not being quite high enough in places. However, these problems were present in the book, so ultimately I can’t criticize the film too much for them. Ultimately, The Hunger Games is an excellent film and is well worth watching. I’m giving it 4/5 stars.

Comments

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Oh, The Force Awakens, you really thought you could show up on the scene and not be polarizing. You were so wrong. Spoiler alert for anyone who, by some magic, hasn’t seen this movie yet, because I’m about to dissect the heck out of this film and also The Phantom Menace’s plot. Let’s jump right into the story. The evil First Order has tracked a map containing the coordinates of the location of Luke Skywalker to a planet, where the Resistance races against time to get the map first. The Resistance pilot going after the plans, Poe Dameron, is captured; his droid, however, escapes with the map. Sound familiar? Well buckle up, kids. Familiarity is about to slap us in the face. Repeatedly. From there, the pilot is rescued by a dude in stormtrooper armor (to be fair, he is a stormtrooper), Finn. He’s a traitor to the First Order, and together they escape. The droid with the map, meanwhile, has made his way to a young adult female (why

Tomorrow Never Dies

Tomorrow Never Dies boasts what may be the most absurd plot of any Bond film. The head of a media outlet tries to start wars in order to have a monopoly on the media coverage of them. If you can’t comprehend the absurdity of that, let me try to give another example. CNN starts World War 3 and has journalists in place to report these events before anyone else can, and no one on the face of the earth thinks that’s shady in any way, shape, or form except for MI6. The question we should all be asking ourselves is how the heck this movie managed to actually be kind of good with a plot like this. The opening sequence is not quite as exhilarating as we’ve come to expect from Brosnan Bond movies, but it’s competent enough. From there, we’re plunged directly into the story. The first act takes its time, explaining delicately in a detailed manner exactly what the media mogul’s plan is, and how he’s going to carry it out. His plot may be absolu

Dunkirk

Let’s be honest. It doesn’t matter what a Christopher Nolan movie is about; if he directed it, we’re going to watch it. Dunkirk focuses on an actual historic event, a first for Nolan. He executes it beautifully. Also, this is spoiler-free. Dunkirk, like many (or maybe all?) of Nolan’s films, places emphasis on time. In Dunkirk, three story threads are followed, each occurring over a different duration of time, but all converging in the end. This can make for a slightly confusing or even frustrating (in parts) narrative, but most of the time it’s all relatively easy to follow. I’ve thought about it for quite some time, and I’m quite certain that is done both for the sake of heightened realism and tonal consistency. The three interweaving plot threads help greatly in keeping the story interesting, and all three’s contributions to growing intensity make for one of the most claustrophobic and uneasy films I’ve ever seen. Because o

SkyWorld

Search This Blog