Skip to main content

Spectre Review



Finally, after a 3 year wait, we get another Bond movie… Spectre. As often happens with Bond movies, my initial determination to critique this movie faded as soon as the gun barrel sequence began, instantly turning me into the hopeless fanboy that I often am. This continued throughout the opening sequence, possibly the most electrifying in the entire series, and ended only when the movie actually began. Why am I telling you all this? Because I need an opening paragraph.

So anyway, Spectre opens with one of the greatest introductions in Bond history, and slowly descends into mediocrity. Then, we get more pulse-pounding action and it’s great again. Then it descends into mediocrity again, and then it’s great again. This is largely what the movie is like up until its fantastic third act. As it turns out, you’ll enjoy Spectre most if you don’t view it as a stand-alone movie, but as the conclusion to a story that has spanned four movies. This may be one reason the movie was despised by so many people, but loved by so many others. Much of the emotion in this movie is implied rather than directly stated, and for me this worked. For others, though, it won’t.


This is absolutely not a traditional Bond film, but if you’ve watched any of Craig’s Bond movies, then you’ll expect that. However, towards the end, (spoiler-ish-ish-ish stuff) Bond finally makes the transition from the cold-hearted, damaged assassin that we’ve come to love to the more traditional character that older audiences will be more familiar with. For some people, this was simply a lazy transition and a lame attempt to please both crowds. For me, it was an excellent completion of the character development that Bond has been slowly going through over the course of these movies. Now, I’m not simply giving its faults a stamp of approval just because it’s a Bond movie. I don’t deny that is certainly has flaws, even a lot of them. The pacing is a bit off in some places, the romance is forced, the second act is all over the place, and several situations are resolved too easily. But ultimately, these flaws are overcome by many rewarding moments. Also, I feel that I should mention that Thomas Newman’s score, while not perfect, is a vast improvement over Skyfall’s, and certainly helps escalate the tension in many scenes. While the movie is, in the end, not as good as Skyfall, it is a worthy successor and an excellent ending chapter for Craig’s Bond, who has been, in my opinion, the best Bond by far. 3.7/5 stars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Incredibles 2

Incredibles 2 picks up right where the first left off: superheroes may be illegal, but the world’s greatest superhero family is still fighting crime uninhibited. Until, of course, they’re forced to stop. Soon, however, Elastigirl gets an offer that allows her to fight crime and fight for the legalization of superheroes. All is well. Incredibles 2 was the sequel everyone wanted, but no one expected. Arriving in theaters 14 years after the original, it might have been easy for the world to assume Pixar simply had nothing else of substance to offer from the world of the Incredibles. The world would have been very wrong. The film sees Brad Bird, director of the original film, make his triumphant return to the series. He wrote the film as well, ensuring the film’s singular, streamlined vision. Bird directs the film spectacularly, maintaining a consistent tone throughout and establishing an effective blueprint for the world the Incredibles inh...
Post a Comment
Read more