Skip to main content

Spectre Review



Finally, after a 3 year wait, we get another Bond movie… Spectre. As often happens with Bond movies, my initial determination to critique this movie faded as soon as the gun barrel sequence began, instantly turning me into the hopeless fanboy that I often am. This continued throughout the opening sequence, possibly the most electrifying in the entire series, and ended only when the movie actually began. Why am I telling you all this? Because I need an opening paragraph.

So anyway, Spectre opens with one of the greatest introductions in Bond history, and slowly descends into mediocrity. Then, we get more pulse-pounding action and it’s great again. Then it descends into mediocrity again, and then it’s great again. This is largely what the movie is like up until its fantastic third act. As it turns out, you’ll enjoy Spectre most if you don’t view it as a stand-alone movie, but as the conclusion to a story that has spanned four movies. This may be one reason the movie was despised by so many people, but loved by so many others. Much of the emotion in this movie is implied rather than directly stated, and for me this worked. For others, though, it won’t.


This is absolutely not a traditional Bond film, but if you’ve watched any of Craig’s Bond movies, then you’ll expect that. However, towards the end, (spoiler-ish-ish-ish stuff) Bond finally makes the transition from the cold-hearted, damaged assassin that we’ve come to love to the more traditional character that older audiences will be more familiar with. For some people, this was simply a lazy transition and a lame attempt to please both crowds. For me, it was an excellent completion of the character development that Bond has been slowly going through over the course of these movies. Now, I’m not simply giving its faults a stamp of approval just because it’s a Bond movie. I don’t deny that is certainly has flaws, even a lot of them. The pacing is a bit off in some places, the romance is forced, the second act is all over the place, and several situations are resolved too easily. But ultimately, these flaws are overcome by many rewarding moments. Also, I feel that I should mention that Thomas Newman’s score, while not perfect, is a vast improvement over Skyfall’s, and certainly helps escalate the tension in many scenes. While the movie is, in the end, not as good as Skyfall, it is a worthy successor and an excellent ending chapter for Craig’s Bond, who has been, in my opinion, the best Bond by far. 3.7/5 stars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Oh, The Force Awakens, you really thought you could show up on the scene and not be polarizing. You were so wrong. Spoiler alert for anyone who, by some magic, hasn’t seen this movie yet, because I’m about to dissect the heck out of this film and also The Phantom Menace’s plot. Let’s jump right into the story. The evil First Order has tracked a map containing the coordinates of the location of Luke Skywalker to a planet, where the Resistance races against time to get the map first. The Resistance pilot going after the plans, Poe Dameron, is captured; his droid, however, escapes with the map. Sound familiar? Well buckle up, kids. Familiarity is about to slap us in the face. Repeatedly. From there, the pilot is rescued by a dude in stormtrooper armor (to be fair, he is a stormtrooper), Finn. He’s a traitor to the First Order, and together they escape. The droid with the map, meanwhile, has made his way to a young adult female (why ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tomorrow Never Dies

Tomorrow Never Dies boasts what may be the most absurd plot of any Bond film. The head of a media outlet tries to start wars in order to have a monopoly on the media coverage of them. If you can’t comprehend the absurdity of that, let me try to give another example. CNN starts World War 3 and has journalists in place to report these events before anyone else can, and no one on the face of the earth thinks that’s shady in any way, shape, or form except for MI6. The question we should all be asking ourselves is how the heck this movie managed to actually be kind of good with a plot like this. The opening sequence is not quite as exhilarating as we’ve come to expect from Brosnan Bond movies, but it’s competent enough. From there, we’re plunged directly into the story. The first act takes its time, explaining delicately in a detailed manner exactly what the media mogul’s plan is, and how he’s going to carry it out. His plot may be absolu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dunkirk

Let’s be honest. It doesn’t matter what a Christopher Nolan movie is about; if he directed it, we’re going to watch it. Dunkirk focuses on an actual historic event, a first for Nolan. He executes it beautifully. Also, this is spoiler-free. Dunkirk, like many (or maybe all?) of Nolan’s films, places emphasis on time. In Dunkirk, three story threads are followed, each occurring over a different duration of time, but all converging in the end. This can make for a slightly confusing or even frustrating (in parts) narrative, but most of the time it’s all relatively easy to follow. I’ve thought about it for quite some time, and I’m quite certain that is done both for the sake of heightened realism and tonal consistency. The three interweaving plot threads help greatly in keeping the story interesting, and all three’s contributions to growing intensity make for one of the most claustrophobic and uneasy films I’ve ever seen. Because o...
Post a Comment
Read more