Skip to main content

Tomorrow Never Dies


























Tomorrow Never Dies boasts what may be the most absurd plot of any Bond film. The head of a media outlet tries to start wars in order to have a monopoly on the media coverage of them. If you can’t comprehend the absurdity of that, let me try to give another example. CNN starts World War 3 and has journalists in place to report these events before anyone else can, and no one on the face of the earth thinks that’s shady in any way, shape, or form except for MI6. The question we should all be asking ourselves is how the heck this movie managed to actually be kind of good with a plot like this.

The opening sequence is not quite as exhilarating as we’ve come to expect from Brosnan Bond movies, but it’s competent enough. From there, we’re plunged directly into the story. The first act takes its time, explaining delicately in a detailed manner exactly what the media mogul’s plan is, and how he’s going to carry it out. His plot may be absolute garbage, but the film is helped by the fact that it never feels rushed. Bond is inevitably sent to investigate the odd string of events, and prevent World War 3. Pretty much a classic Bond story.

One of the main things the film has going for it is the fact that it hardly ever loses momentum. It moves forward constantly, stopping only for brief periods of time to delve into character a bit. These character moments (by this I mean Bond movie character moments, not necessarily the real thing) help to lift the movie up a bit, and give it a sobering edge by killing off a supporting character. The plot moves quickly and in a formulaic manner, with Bond getting captured and escaping before initiating an explosive finale. One unique detail of the film is Bond teaming up with a Chinese agent. It gives it a nice, fresh feel. However, it also introduces some problems.

The main problem with Tomorrow Never Dies is its excessive detours into formula and its apparent identity crisis. The film doesn’t seem exactly sure of what it wants to be, transitioning through tones abruptly. It tries to be dark in places and then undercuts the tension with a quick one-liner. Additionally, it lacks a bit of setup when it comes to Bond’s partner. We see a few quick clips of her before the inevitable team-up, but her sudden introduction as a supporting character feels a bit jarring. The film is also a bit too long. It drags the resolution out too much, sprinkling in pointless and weightless chase scenes when it could be wrapping everything up.

That said, the film does mostly succeed in being entertaining. It’s confident, energetic, and you almost get the feeling that the people behind it were genuinely excited about it. Brosnan again does a fine job playing Bond, achieving a perfect balance between the light and dark constantly battling in the character. Michelle Yeoh does a perfectly capable job as his counterpart, and Jonathan Pryce plays the heck out of the villain, Elliot Carver. Even Teri Hatcher does a competent job, shockingly.


Overall, Tomorrow Never Dies is one of the better formulaic Bond flicks. It has a few qualities which elevate it above standard (at least at the time) Bond fare, and it’s worth checking out if you just want to be entertained for a couple hours. I’m giving it 3.2/5 stars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Casino Royale Review

Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.) The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immedia...
Post a Comment
Read more