Skip to main content

Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice


Oh, Zack Snyder. What have you done?

I’m tempted to just leave my review at that. Batman V. Superman is a mess, and one with not a lot of redeeming qualities. The movie opens with a narration from Bruce Wayne, and he’s probably high when he’s saying whatever he said, because it makes less sense than Donald Trump trying to convince people he’s never insulted women. And then the movie takes off, at a pace of maybe 5 MPH, if I’m being generous. Envision your great-grandmother driving for the first time. Then imagine that she’s driving a car that has a maximum speed of about 2 MPH. That’s roughly equivalent to the pace of this movie. Wow. Where do I even begin?

Superman’s actions are beginning to be questioned. Why now, and not immediately after the events of Man of Steel, you ask? Well, who knows? The writers certainly didn’t. Meanwhile, in Gotham City, Bruce Wayne decides to take matters into his own hands even though the government is probably slightly more equipped to do that, and they’re investigating Superman anyway. Why does Bruce Wayne hate Superman, you ask? Because Superman threw Zod through a skyscraper that apparently had somebody in it, or something, when every building in the area was supposed to be evacuated. It’s not like Superman saved everybody on earth, with minimal casualties, and probably didn’t even directly cause a single death. The motivations in this movie are just the worst, in case you were wondering. Meanwhile, Lex Luthor also wants Superman dead, because, in his own words, if you’re all-powerful, you can’t be all good. Even overlooking the philosophical problems of this idea, Superman isn’t all-powerful, and Lex knows this. After all, if he wants Batman to kill him, then he must believe Batman has a chance to kill him, right? How did the writers come up with a plot like this, you ask? Well, we can’t be sure because we weren’t there, but it’s safe to assume they’d probably been smoking some weed to keep them awake, because Warner Brothers probably gave the writers about 4 weeks to come up with a final script, because that’s apparently what they really do. (I’m not joking, they actually did this to the Suicide Squad writers.)

Plot problems and character motivations (or lack thereof) aside, the pacing of the movie is atrocious. Nothing happens for about the first 2 hours. Superman and Batman slowly begin to hate each other, and then they finally fight. The fight itself is pathetic. After waiting for 2 hours, we got maybe a 7 minute fight scene. (Note to rabid DC fanboys: Captain America: Civil War gave us a fight scene over 15 minutes long. This is why people like Marvel movies more.) And then comes, perhaps, the most moronic character development ever devised. Batman defeats Superman, and as he’s about to kill him, Superman pleads “Save Martha”. Why would he call his mother by her first name, you ask? Because the writers just didn’t care. Anyway, Martha was the name of Batman’s murdered mother. Suddenly, all of the concerns he has about Superman’s nearly unlimited power are erased from existence, and he becomes a new man, but only after shouting the cringe-worthy line “Why did you say that name?!” repeatedly, as if we weren't crying in terror after hearing it just once.

Next, I have to talk about the tragic attempt at world-building. There are so many forced moments and pointless cameos that after a while it becomes tiring. Look, building your world like this just does not work. Iron Man 2 tried to build the Marvel universe like this too, and that movie fell flat on its face. It’s cool that Wonder Woman shows up in the finale, sure. But why is she there? What does she contribute to the final battle? Absolutely nothing. If you think it sounds like I absolutely despise this movie, you would be wrong. There are only a few movies that I truly loathe, and this isn’t one of them. I merely dislike the majority of it. So this brings us to the good things about it.

Contrary to what you may have heard, this isn’t the worst movie ever made. It’s a complete mess, sure. But it’s got a couple of redeeming qualities. Ben Affleck is the bright spot of the movie, playing Batman to absolute perfection. Henry Cavill isn’t given a whole lot to do, but he does a good job with what few emotions he does get to show. The CGI looks great, with the exception of Doomsday, who looks like Playdough and mud thrown together. Gal Gadot does a nice job playing Wonder Woman, though I’m still clueless as to why her presence was necessary in the movie. Jesse Eisenberg also does a good job, the person he’s playing just isn’t Lex Luthor. The direction is… sort of competent, I guess? Zimmer’s score provides a nice backdrop, but isn’t quite as good as his score for Man of Steel. The movie as a whole is mildly entertaining in parts, and then the last 30 minutes or so are pretty solid. So what I’m trying to say is that this isn’t Batman & Robin 2.0, because that movie doesn’t have a single redeeming quality other than the fact that it ended Schumacher’s Batman movies.


 So, to sum it up, Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Worse Than Mediocrity is a wasted opportunity on many levels. And really, I don’t think Snyder is to blame for this. There are better directors, sure. But the problems are all in the script. The writers absolutely and thoroughly failed to do their jobs. So, would I recommend this movie? Sure, if only because of Batman and the fact that you’ll need to watch this to know what’s going on in upcoming DCEU movies. If this were anything other than a superhero movie, and a necessary (to watch) part of a series that will hopefully get far better, I would probably advise you to avoid it like Walmart bathrooms without toilet paper. But sadly, it’s required viewing if you’re gonna watch the rest of the DCEU. So get ready to throw away two and a half hours of your life, unless you fall asleep during the movie, in which case your time will be well spent. 2.8/5 stars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Oh, The Force Awakens, you really thought you could show up on the scene and not be polarizing. You were so wrong. Spoiler alert for anyone who, by some magic, hasn’t seen this movie yet, because I’m about to dissect the heck out of this film and also The Phantom Menace’s plot. Let’s jump right into the story. The evil First Order has tracked a map containing the coordinates of the location of Luke Skywalker to a planet, where the Resistance races against time to get the map first. The Resistance pilot going after the plans, Poe Dameron, is captured; his droid, however, escapes with the map. Sound familiar? Well buckle up, kids. Familiarity is about to slap us in the face. Repeatedly. From there, the pilot is rescued by a dude in stormtrooper armor (to be fair, he is a stormtrooper), Finn. He’s a traitor to the First Order, and together they escape. The droid with the map, meanwhile, has made his way to a young adult female (why ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tomorrow Never Dies

Tomorrow Never Dies boasts what may be the most absurd plot of any Bond film. The head of a media outlet tries to start wars in order to have a monopoly on the media coverage of them. If you can’t comprehend the absurdity of that, let me try to give another example. CNN starts World War 3 and has journalists in place to report these events before anyone else can, and no one on the face of the earth thinks that’s shady in any way, shape, or form except for MI6. The question we should all be asking ourselves is how the heck this movie managed to actually be kind of good with a plot like this. The opening sequence is not quite as exhilarating as we’ve come to expect from Brosnan Bond movies, but it’s competent enough. From there, we’re plunged directly into the story. The first act takes its time, explaining delicately in a detailed manner exactly what the media mogul’s plan is, and how he’s going to carry it out. His plot may be absolu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dunkirk

Let’s be honest. It doesn’t matter what a Christopher Nolan movie is about; if he directed it, we’re going to watch it. Dunkirk focuses on an actual historic event, a first for Nolan. He executes it beautifully. Also, this is spoiler-free. Dunkirk, like many (or maybe all?) of Nolan’s films, places emphasis on time. In Dunkirk, three story threads are followed, each occurring over a different duration of time, but all converging in the end. This can make for a slightly confusing or even frustrating (in parts) narrative, but most of the time it’s all relatively easy to follow. I’ve thought about it for quite some time, and I’m quite certain that is done both for the sake of heightened realism and tonal consistency. The three interweaving plot threads help greatly in keeping the story interesting, and all three’s contributions to growing intensity make for one of the most claustrophobic and uneasy films I’ve ever seen. Because o...
Post a Comment
Read more