Skip to main content

Casino Royale Review




Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.)

The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immediately evident that this will be a different type of Bond film. Despite the fact that the movie would seemingly be all story and no action, it maintains an excellent balance, injecting action when the story starts to slow down.

Perhaps the thing that separates this film so much from all other Bond movies is the emotion that Bond shows. After so many movies showing Bond to be a calm, emotionless killing machine, we're finally shown here that he does genuinely care about people, and it's only because of this fact that he's so cold. The romance between Vesper and Bond makes what would already be a fantastic movie simply incredible. Bond finally gives up his playboy lifestyle and genuinely falls in love, even deciding to quit his job to be with her. Basically, he's finally human, and that's why this movie ultimately succeeds on so many levels.

The acting is spot-on. Daniel Craig is easily the best Bond to have ever graced the screen. He portrays Bond as a scarred individual who still feels deeply, despite his outward appearance of being cold. Eva Green doesn't quite stand out to the degree Craig does, but she does a good job with the role she's given. The cinematography was top-notch, and the editing was excellent as well. The movie never feels unbalanced or poorly paced. David Arnold's score is pure brilliance. The action tracks don't necessarily stand out nearly as much as the more emotional ones, but they are certainly satisfactory. Perhaps the reason for this is because this movie is ultimately a prequel. Bond is not yet the agent we're so familiar with. He's more vulnerable and emotional.


Overall, this is a simply fantastic film. I would recommend it not only to Bond fans, but to fans of action movies in general. You won't regret it. 5 out of 5 Aston Martins from me.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...
Post a Comment
Read more