Skip to main content

Casino Royale Review




Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.)

The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immediately evident that this will be a different type of Bond film. Despite the fact that the movie would seemingly be all story and no action, it maintains an excellent balance, injecting action when the story starts to slow down.

Perhaps the thing that separates this film so much from all other Bond movies is the emotion that Bond shows. After so many movies showing Bond to be a calm, emotionless killing machine, we're finally shown here that he does genuinely care about people, and it's only because of this fact that he's so cold. The romance between Vesper and Bond makes what would already be a fantastic movie simply incredible. Bond finally gives up his playboy lifestyle and genuinely falls in love, even deciding to quit his job to be with her. Basically, he's finally human, and that's why this movie ultimately succeeds on so many levels.

The acting is spot-on. Daniel Craig is easily the best Bond to have ever graced the screen. He portrays Bond as a scarred individual who still feels deeply, despite his outward appearance of being cold. Eva Green doesn't quite stand out to the degree Craig does, but she does a good job with the role she's given. The cinematography was top-notch, and the editing was excellent as well. The movie never feels unbalanced or poorly paced. David Arnold's score is pure brilliance. The action tracks don't necessarily stand out nearly as much as the more emotional ones, but they are certainly satisfactory. Perhaps the reason for this is because this movie is ultimately a prequel. Bond is not yet the agent we're so familiar with. He's more vulnerable and emotional.


Overall, this is a simply fantastic film. I would recommend it not only to Bond fans, but to fans of action movies in general. You won't regret it. 5 out of 5 Aston Martins from me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wonder Woman

Ah, Wonder Woman: the anomaly of the DC Extended Universe is the movie that most of us expected to continue the trend of mediocre or even atrocious films. We were all shocked when it became one of the best-reviewed superhero films of all time. Spoiler alert: I’m about to discuss the ending in detail. The plot is a fairly standard, straightforward origin story. It’s given more depth than usual by the fact that the film is set during World War 1. The pacing of the film’s first act is absolutely impeccable, setting up everything to follow with great efficiency. We’re given time to get to know the characters, understand their motivations, and we’re told the backstory that will play into the film later early on in a completely organic way. After Steve and Diana leave Themyscira, the plot begins to move quickly. After a bit of discussion, they decide to join the war with a small band of men. This is the point at which Diana truly comes...

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...

Avengers: Infinity War

Avengers: Infinity War is the cinematic event of a generation, an unparalleled and previously un-attempted 10-year gamble that paid off. The film is the first part of the culmination of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, masterfully and efficiently tying every previously established story thread into one movie. I’m sure you’re already familiar with the story, but I’ll hit some of the story’s high points just in case you’ve been living under a cultural rock for the last decade. Thanos, one of the universe’s most powerful beings, sets out to attain ultimate power by collecting all six Infinity Stones, each of which grants him a specific type of power. All that stands in his way are the Avengers. Infinity War was always destined to feel more like an event than a film, and those are expectations it easily lives up (or down) to. However, perhaps that’s more of a testament to the MCU’s excellent storytelling than to Infinity War’s preoccupation wi...