Skip to main content

Incredibles 2






















Incredibles 2 picks up right where the first left off: superheroes may be illegal, but the world’s greatest superhero family is still fighting crime uninhibited. Until, of course, they’re forced to stop. Soon, however, Elastigirl gets an offer that allows her to fight crime and fight for the legalization of superheroes. All is well.
Incredibles 2 was the sequel everyone wanted, but no one expected. Arriving in theaters 14 years after the original, it might have been easy for the world to assume Pixar simply had nothing else of substance to offer from the world of the Incredibles. The world would have been very wrong.
The film sees Brad Bird, director of the original film, make his triumphant return to the series. He wrote the film as well, ensuring the film’s singular, streamlined vision. Bird directs the film spectacularly, maintaining a consistent tone throughout and establishing an effective blueprint for the world the Incredibles inhabit.
Returning to score the film is Michael Giacchino, who scored the original over a decade ago. His score here, while not as memorable as his original one, still underscores the film well and continues to eke out a musical identity for the Incredibles in a densely populated superhero world.
The film’s greatest flaw is its emphasis on the legality of superheroes or the lack thereof. This has been the focus of far too many superhero films recently, but the majority of Incredibles 2 doesn’t seek to tackle the moral complexities of the issue, refreshingly. While the premise of the film may be faulty, it is essentially only used as a springboard for the plot, and so the movie suffers very little from it.
The themes of the film remain as relevant as ever: the nature of family, sacrificial love, and surprisingly, the limitations of human power and human independence. It’s themes like these that made the original so powerful, and they return in full force for the sequel.
Incredibles 2’s greatest strength is its script, written so tightly that hardly a single word is wasted. Despite this, the film never feels rushed, developing its plot at a logically consistent pace. Nearly every character has a well-developed arc, giving the film’s climax an emotional payoff that the first film only toyed with.
The film’s other weakness is its predictable villain. Their true identity is a twist that can be seen coming from miles away, and it hurts the film to some degree. There is also arguably too little time given to the villain to develop, their motivations to fight the Incredibles seeming forced as a result.
Overall, however, the film is another homerun for Pixar. The minor issues of the film really do not detract from the audience’s enjoyment of it in any meaningful way, and aside from these flaws it is an exercise in excellence. Here’s to hoping for one more. 4.2/5.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...

Casino Royale Review

Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.) The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immedia...