Skip to main content

Incredibles 2






















Incredibles 2 picks up right where the first left off: superheroes may be illegal, but the world’s greatest superhero family is still fighting crime uninhibited. Until, of course, they’re forced to stop. Soon, however, Elastigirl gets an offer that allows her to fight crime and fight for the legalization of superheroes. All is well.
Incredibles 2 was the sequel everyone wanted, but no one expected. Arriving in theaters 14 years after the original, it might have been easy for the world to assume Pixar simply had nothing else of substance to offer from the world of the Incredibles. The world would have been very wrong.
The film sees Brad Bird, director of the original film, make his triumphant return to the series. He wrote the film as well, ensuring the film’s singular, streamlined vision. Bird directs the film spectacularly, maintaining a consistent tone throughout and establishing an effective blueprint for the world the Incredibles inhabit.
Returning to score the film is Michael Giacchino, who scored the original over a decade ago. His score here, while not as memorable as his original one, still underscores the film well and continues to eke out a musical identity for the Incredibles in a densely populated superhero world.
The film’s greatest flaw is its emphasis on the legality of superheroes or the lack thereof. This has been the focus of far too many superhero films recently, but the majority of Incredibles 2 doesn’t seek to tackle the moral complexities of the issue, refreshingly. While the premise of the film may be faulty, it is essentially only used as a springboard for the plot, and so the movie suffers very little from it.
The themes of the film remain as relevant as ever: the nature of family, sacrificial love, and surprisingly, the limitations of human power and human independence. It’s themes like these that made the original so powerful, and they return in full force for the sequel.
Incredibles 2’s greatest strength is its script, written so tightly that hardly a single word is wasted. Despite this, the film never feels rushed, developing its plot at a logically consistent pace. Nearly every character has a well-developed arc, giving the film’s climax an emotional payoff that the first film only toyed with.
The film’s other weakness is its predictable villain. Their true identity is a twist that can be seen coming from miles away, and it hurts the film to some degree. There is also arguably too little time given to the villain to develop, their motivations to fight the Incredibles seeming forced as a result.
Overall, however, the film is another homerun for Pixar. The minor issues of the film really do not detract from the audience’s enjoyment of it in any meaningful way, and aside from these flaws it is an exercise in excellence. Here’s to hoping for one more. 4.2/5.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Oh, The Force Awakens, you really thought you could show up on the scene and not be polarizing. You were so wrong. Spoiler alert for anyone who, by some magic, hasn’t seen this movie yet, because I’m about to dissect the heck out of this film and also The Phantom Menace’s plot. Let’s jump right into the story. The evil First Order has tracked a map containing the coordinates of the location of Luke Skywalker to a planet, where the Resistance races against time to get the map first. The Resistance pilot going after the plans, Poe Dameron, is captured; his droid, however, escapes with the map. Sound familiar? Well buckle up, kids. Familiarity is about to slap us in the face. Repeatedly. From there, the pilot is rescued by a dude in stormtrooper armor (to be fair, he is a stormtrooper), Finn. He’s a traitor to the First Order, and together they escape. The droid with the map, meanwhile, has made his way to a young adult female (why
Post a Comment
Read more

Tomorrow Never Dies

Tomorrow Never Dies boasts what may be the most absurd plot of any Bond film. The head of a media outlet tries to start wars in order to have a monopoly on the media coverage of them. If you can’t comprehend the absurdity of that, let me try to give another example. CNN starts World War 3 and has journalists in place to report these events before anyone else can, and no one on the face of the earth thinks that’s shady in any way, shape, or form except for MI6. The question we should all be asking ourselves is how the heck this movie managed to actually be kind of good with a plot like this. The opening sequence is not quite as exhilarating as we’ve come to expect from Brosnan Bond movies, but it’s competent enough. From there, we’re plunged directly into the story. The first act takes its time, explaining delicately in a detailed manner exactly what the media mogul’s plan is, and how he’s going to carry it out. His plot may be absolu
Post a Comment
Read more

Dunkirk

Let’s be honest. It doesn’t matter what a Christopher Nolan movie is about; if he directed it, we’re going to watch it. Dunkirk focuses on an actual historic event, a first for Nolan. He executes it beautifully. Also, this is spoiler-free. Dunkirk, like many (or maybe all?) of Nolan’s films, places emphasis on time. In Dunkirk, three story threads are followed, each occurring over a different duration of time, but all converging in the end. This can make for a slightly confusing or even frustrating (in parts) narrative, but most of the time it’s all relatively easy to follow. I’ve thought about it for quite some time, and I’m quite certain that is done both for the sake of heightened realism and tonal consistency. The three interweaving plot threads help greatly in keeping the story interesting, and all three’s contributions to growing intensity make for one of the most claustrophobic and uneasy films I’ve ever seen. Because o
Post a Comment
Read more