Skip to main content

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Review


Oh. Heck. Yes. Yeah, Peter Jackson is still awesome. With Desolation of Smaug (do you say it “Smowg” or “Smog”), Peter Jackson is once again in top form. I loved nearly everything about this movie. LORD OF THE RINGS IS BACK BABY. I know, I’m such a fangirl. I apologize. Seriously though, this movie nails everything. Yeah, fine. I’ll get on to the review.

So, as you can tell, I like this movie. A lot. Like, a heck of a lot. Everything An Unexpected Journey did wrong, this movie gets right. The formula from the first movie remains largely unchanged, but it is significantly improved upon. We still don’t get to see a lot about the personalities of the dwarves. But we get to see a few of their personalities, and that technically constitutes character development. Right? Right. Don’t get freaked out, it’s okay. I answer myself all the time. The emotional depth is there this time. It’s FINALLY THERE. The movie tries to tie itself to Lord of the Rings in even more dramatic ways this time. But it works this time. Oh, how beautifully it works.

It’s a prequel in all the right ways this time. A lot of people despise this movie because of how it differs from the book. Honestly, I. Just. Don’t. Care. It’s not like any major story points are changed. Heck, if you ask me, the book was improved upon. It was just never that deep or even exciting. Don’t get me wrong, I liked the book. But the story is just so much better in this movie. While An Unexpected Journey ultimately just felt a little like a slightly dull CGI-fest, this movie is involving in nearly every way. It’s funny when it needs to be, exciting constantly, emotionally moving at the right moments, and ultimately it’s just a far stronger entry. It’s the Empire Strikes Back of the Hobbit trilogy, if you will. It’s far darker, and there’s just so much more at stake this time. The actors still continue to impress, with Martin Freeman still delivering in the role of Bilbo. Richard Armitage also gets a bit more of a chance to shine in this movie, as Thorin’s personality becomes a bit deeper. Howard Shore continues to greatly impress, his score this time around being even more impressive than his previous one. It’s just a very well-made film, and even those who hate it would probably not deny this. If this movie has a flaw, it’s that it begins to drag on a bit when the dwarves finally confront Smaug. However, this sequence is still astoundingly well executed, and ultimately, this is the only problem I have with the movie. It’s worth suffering through the first one to get to this one. Trust me. 4.5/5 stars. Nearly perfect.


Also. SMAUG THOUGH.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Casino Royale Review

Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.) The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immedia...
Post a Comment
Read more