Skip to main content

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Review



Ugh. I desperately wanted to love this movie after Desolation of Smaug absolutely defied all of my slightly pessimistic expectations. It just wasn’t as good as it could have been, though. That’s not to say it’s as bad as An Unexpected Journey, though. Because it’s not. It’s pretty good. Okay, I’m going to stop being vague and just move on to the actual review.

Battle of the Five Armies picks up mere minutes after Desolation of Smaug ends, and honestly the first 15 minutes or so are absolutely bizarre. Moving on though. I honestly thought that the first hour of this movie was excellent, though Thorin’s dragon-sickness did begin to drag on a bit towards the end, and when it did finally end, it was in an absolutely bizarre scene. Okay, moving past the bizarre scenes. This movie excels in its more quiet and emotional moments. Then the battle comes. This should have been the most amazing battle in cinematic history. But it just wasn’t. I’m not going to say it kind of drug on and on, because it didn’t. It just felt really un-involving at times, and I really wish they had taken a bit more of a Helm’s Deep-ish approach to this battle, rather than just focusing on a few of the characters’ battles instead of the overall battle. I’m nitpicking though. This is really not a movie in a traditional sense. It’s basically a 2 ½ hour battle, so it’s obviously going to be hard for me to review it. Nearly all of the characters are finally explored in some depth, something I felt was desperately needed in the first installment. I feel like if about 30 minutes of the battle were taken out, this film would have been far better. But they aren’t, and so it does tend to drag a bit in parts. It doesn’t remain uninteresting though, as it always switches back to something or someone we care about.


The hour or so before the battle and the aftermath of the battle were my favorite parts of the movie. In those parts, we got to see a glimpse of Peter Jackson’s magical touch, and it reminded me of why the world loves Lord of the Rings so much. Both of these sections were emotionally driven, and ultimately that’s what I didn’t like about the battle section of the movie. In Lord of the Rings, even the battles were emotionally driven. In the battles at Moria and Parth Galen, you could feel the Fellowship’s fear and desperation. In the battle at Helm’s Deep, you could feel the sheer terror, and then the triumph at the end. In the battle of Minas Tirith, you could feel the fury of the Rohirrim and the desperation of the Gondorians. That’s what was ultimately missing from this movie. In the endless stream of battle scenes, the emotion tends to often get lost. Ultimately, though, I still liked this movie, and I would recommend it. It’s a fitting conclusion to the Middle-Earth that so many of us grew up with, and some of the magic that made us love those movies so much is present here. The acting is still phenomenal. Martin Freeman once again absolutely nails his role as Bilbo. To me, he will always be Bilbo. I also feel that I need to mention Ian Mckellen, as I haven’t in my other two reviews of this trilogy. He is still absolutely excellent as Gandalf, and in some parts of this series, he carries the movies on his shoulders. I also feel like it would be a crime to conclude without mentioning the incredible score of Howard Shore. More than perhaps anyone else, he helped to define this incarnation of Middle-Earth with his truly phenomenal scores. Also I want to mention that Billy Boyd’s “The Last Goodbye” is a truly excellent, deeply moving song that harkens back to Into the West. This is a flawed movie in a flawed trilogy, but ultimately I would recommend it, just on the basis of it being a mostly satisfying farewell to this world that we all love so much. Bravo to all involved. It’s been a truly remarkable journey.3.8/5 stars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revenge of the Sith Review

I’m sure you’ve probably heard that Revenge of the Sith is just slightly better than The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones. In my opinion, that is completely untrue. Revenge of the Sith is a masterpiece. Let me explain why I think so. First of all, the plot here is just so much better. Even the dialogue is greatly improved. It’s still not perfect, but it’s only cringe-worthy in a few scenes. That in and of itself is a huge improvement. Secondly, George Lucas has the power of his own legendary original trilogy behind him this time. Finally, we get to witness Anakin become Darth Vader. And it’s glorious. We finally get a little bit of believability when it comes to why Anakin turned to the dark side. This time, it’s not just because he was an arrogant brat. We’re finally able to believe that he was pushed over the edge. On a technical level, everything is flawless, and the CGI still looks incredible today. The acting is far better this time around, and Hayden Christensen i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thor: Ragnarok

Thor: Ragnarok is the third and final film in the Thor series. The movie finds Thor humbled, hammer-less, and in a desperate race against time to save Asgard. Ragnarok finds Taika Waititi taking over directorial duties, Kenneth Branagh having directed the first in the series and Alan Taylor having directed the second. Both Branagh and Taylor played the first two films dreadfully seriously. While the first had intermittent, light humor, the second film was oppressively dark and grim. Waititi corrects this problem in only five minutes. Ragnarok’s prologue alone contains more lighthearted fun than both of the previous films combined. Waititi has a bit of a reputation for his oddball sense of humor, but it works wonders for Ragnarok . Waititi suggested that much of the film’s dialogue be improvised, and it does a great deal to reinforce the film’s themes of uncertainty and insecurity. The randomness and off-the-wall quality of the jokes makes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Casino Royale Review

Back when this film came out in 2006, there wasn't much hope for the future of Bond. The last few films had been train wrecks when it came to getting a good critical response. With the exception of Goldeneye and two or three Roger Moore films, there hadn't been a truly good Bond movie since Sean Connery gave up the role. That was all about to change. Eon Productions brought back Martin Campbell to direct Casino Royale, his last Bond film having been Goldeneye. What little hope there had been for Casino Royale was completely demolished when it was announced Daniel Craig would be playing Bond. It was a huge gamble. (No pun intended.) The film opens in the classic Bond manner, with Bond on a random mission which leads into a chase. Once we finally get to the actual story, we learn that a gambler named Le Chiffre (I'm still not sure how that's accurately pronounced) is joining a high-stakes poker game, and Bond is sent to join the game and beat him. It's immedia...
Post a Comment
Read more