Skip to main content

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Review



Ugh. I desperately wanted to love this movie after Desolation of Smaug absolutely defied all of my slightly pessimistic expectations. It just wasn’t as good as it could have been, though. That’s not to say it’s as bad as An Unexpected Journey, though. Because it’s not. It’s pretty good. Okay, I’m going to stop being vague and just move on to the actual review.

Battle of the Five Armies picks up mere minutes after Desolation of Smaug ends, and honestly the first 15 minutes or so are absolutely bizarre. Moving on though. I honestly thought that the first hour of this movie was excellent, though Thorin’s dragon-sickness did begin to drag on a bit towards the end, and when it did finally end, it was in an absolutely bizarre scene. Okay, moving past the bizarre scenes. This movie excels in its more quiet and emotional moments. Then the battle comes. This should have been the most amazing battle in cinematic history. But it just wasn’t. I’m not going to say it kind of drug on and on, because it didn’t. It just felt really un-involving at times, and I really wish they had taken a bit more of a Helm’s Deep-ish approach to this battle, rather than just focusing on a few of the characters’ battles instead of the overall battle. I’m nitpicking though. This is really not a movie in a traditional sense. It’s basically a 2 ½ hour battle, so it’s obviously going to be hard for me to review it. Nearly all of the characters are finally explored in some depth, something I felt was desperately needed in the first installment. I feel like if about 30 minutes of the battle were taken out, this film would have been far better. But they aren’t, and so it does tend to drag a bit in parts. It doesn’t remain uninteresting though, as it always switches back to something or someone we care about.


The hour or so before the battle and the aftermath of the battle were my favorite parts of the movie. In those parts, we got to see a glimpse of Peter Jackson’s magical touch, and it reminded me of why the world loves Lord of the Rings so much. Both of these sections were emotionally driven, and ultimately that’s what I didn’t like about the battle section of the movie. In Lord of the Rings, even the battles were emotionally driven. In the battles at Moria and Parth Galen, you could feel the Fellowship’s fear and desperation. In the battle at Helm’s Deep, you could feel the sheer terror, and then the triumph at the end. In the battle of Minas Tirith, you could feel the fury of the Rohirrim and the desperation of the Gondorians. That’s what was ultimately missing from this movie. In the endless stream of battle scenes, the emotion tends to often get lost. Ultimately, though, I still liked this movie, and I would recommend it. It’s a fitting conclusion to the Middle-Earth that so many of us grew up with, and some of the magic that made us love those movies so much is present here. The acting is still phenomenal. Martin Freeman once again absolutely nails his role as Bilbo. To me, he will always be Bilbo. I also feel that I need to mention Ian Mckellen, as I haven’t in my other two reviews of this trilogy. He is still absolutely excellent as Gandalf, and in some parts of this series, he carries the movies on his shoulders. I also feel like it would be a crime to conclude without mentioning the incredible score of Howard Shore. More than perhaps anyone else, he helped to define this incarnation of Middle-Earth with his truly phenomenal scores. Also I want to mention that Billy Boyd’s “The Last Goodbye” is a truly excellent, deeply moving song that harkens back to Into the West. This is a flawed movie in a flawed trilogy, but ultimately I would recommend it, just on the basis of it being a mostly satisfying farewell to this world that we all love so much. Bravo to all involved. It’s been a truly remarkable journey.3.8/5 stars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Oh, The Force Awakens, you really thought you could show up on the scene and not be polarizing. You were so wrong. Spoiler alert for anyone who, by some magic, hasn’t seen this movie yet, because I’m about to dissect the heck out of this film and also The Phantom Menace’s plot. Let’s jump right into the story. The evil First Order has tracked a map containing the coordinates of the location of Luke Skywalker to a planet, where the Resistance races against time to get the map first. The Resistance pilot going after the plans, Poe Dameron, is captured; his droid, however, escapes with the map. Sound familiar? Well buckle up, kids. Familiarity is about to slap us in the face. Repeatedly. From there, the pilot is rescued by a dude in stormtrooper armor (to be fair, he is a stormtrooper), Finn. He’s a traitor to the First Order, and together they escape. The droid with the map, meanwhile, has made his way to a young adult female (why
Post a Comment
Read more

Tomorrow Never Dies

Tomorrow Never Dies boasts what may be the most absurd plot of any Bond film. The head of a media outlet tries to start wars in order to have a monopoly on the media coverage of them. If you can’t comprehend the absurdity of that, let me try to give another example. CNN starts World War 3 and has journalists in place to report these events before anyone else can, and no one on the face of the earth thinks that’s shady in any way, shape, or form except for MI6. The question we should all be asking ourselves is how the heck this movie managed to actually be kind of good with a plot like this. The opening sequence is not quite as exhilarating as we’ve come to expect from Brosnan Bond movies, but it’s competent enough. From there, we’re plunged directly into the story. The first act takes its time, explaining delicately in a detailed manner exactly what the media mogul’s plan is, and how he’s going to carry it out. His plot may be absolu
Post a Comment
Read more

Dunkirk

Let’s be honest. It doesn’t matter what a Christopher Nolan movie is about; if he directed it, we’re going to watch it. Dunkirk focuses on an actual historic event, a first for Nolan. He executes it beautifully. Also, this is spoiler-free. Dunkirk, like many (or maybe all?) of Nolan’s films, places emphasis on time. In Dunkirk, three story threads are followed, each occurring over a different duration of time, but all converging in the end. This can make for a slightly confusing or even frustrating (in parts) narrative, but most of the time it’s all relatively easy to follow. I’ve thought about it for quite some time, and I’m quite certain that is done both for the sake of heightened realism and tonal consistency. The three interweaving plot threads help greatly in keeping the story interesting, and all three’s contributions to growing intensity make for one of the most claustrophobic and uneasy films I’ve ever seen. Because o
Post a Comment
Read more